¶ Transnationalism vs. Colonialism
← Transnationalism vs. Colonialism (3) | Transnationalism vs. Colonialism →
Index Entry
Transnationalism vs. Colonialism:
“obtain the chemical element resources necessary to your manufacturing which are not available in our country and will have to bring them to us from wherever they may be. You will have to use the physical resources of Mexico whenever and wherever they exist and above all, you will have to bring world import and export advantage to us.”
"General Motors and Ford suddenly found this highly profitable, as had also, long years earlier, Singer Sewing Machine and others.
“This is the major pattern of transnational industrialization. Thus the transnationalized corporation no longer needs Army or Navy from its country of origin to protect its on-foreign-soil interests because wealth has been brought to the small country, wherefore the small country inherently protects the transnational corporation. Transnationalism is nor being participated in by the communist countries as well as the industrial majors. The net of all this is that colonialism took physical wealth away from the weaker country and left people in ignorance while transnationalism brings both physical and metaphysical ‘know-how’ wealth to the weaker country, thus increasing the minor nations’ wealth and literacy quite independently of ideological factors.”
¶ Citations
- “Lvening of the World’s Power Structures,” p.33, 10 Apr’74
