¶ Tetrahedral Dynamics (3)
← Tetrahedral Dynamics (2) | Tetra Edge →
Index Entry
Tetrahedral Dynamics:
“long ago discovered that systems had inherent convexity and concavity and required irreversible turbining of their omni-geared Universe event relationships. Inasmuch as all systems could be turned inside-out, having inherent insideness and outsideness, I discovered that mirror reversal of the rubber glove from one hand to the other could be accomplished without reversal of the finger-wrist axis. I think your words ‘up’ and ‘down’ are meaningless. Which direction is up? Which is down? Are people in China upside down? Which star should one’s head be pointing at to be identified as ‘up’? What you mean is what you say in your next phrase, i.e., in and out. Aviators come in for a landing and go out for altitude. In and out refer to focal centers of systems of local events of Universe only. ‘In’ is unique to individual systems. One ‘out’ is common to all systems and is omnidirectional in respect to any one system and Universe, being a plurality of continuities of local dynamical experiences, the direction out of Universe is not integrative as geometrically identifiable as it is permeative and comprehensive of experience. The outness permeates the nuclear event remoteness. I think what you mean by ‘unitary linear vertical supports’ refers to my altitudinally exaggerated tetrahedral dynamic equilibrium.”
¶ Citations
- RBF Ltr. to Lewis E. Lloyd, 4 May’57
