← Modelability | Modelability →
Index Entry
Modelability:
"Scientists did continue to employ schematic models, but as a scaffolding for working assumptions that they said bore no resemblance in reality to the actual events taking place entirely invisibly and formlessly in nature’s fundamental energy transactions. We thus have had scientists working on instruments for a little over a century;…
"It is easy to understand how scientific thinking became independent of models. Scientists have gotten along very nicely without them. The great social and epistemological dichotomies opened between the sciences and the humanities… because there were no conceptual models to be comprehended by the humanities. When the authors and reporters for the humanities came to the scientists for conceptual explanation of science’sm invisible discoveries, they said, ‘What is it you are doing here? I see no model. I have to have a model to describe to people.’ The scientists shook their heads and said, ‘There are no models. Science speaks only in abstract mathematical equations.’
“Tetrahedral accounting or quantation removes the dilemma.”
