← Halo Concept | Halo Concept →
Index Entry
Halo Concept:
“Halo conceptioning discloses the minute yet finitely discrete inaccuracy of the fundamental assumption upon which calculus was built; to wit, that for an infinitesimal moment a line is congruent with the circle to which it is tangent and the plane is congruent with the sphere to which it is tangent. Calculus had assumed 360 degrees around every point on a sphere. The sum of a sphere’s angles was said to be infinite. The halo concept and its angularly generated topology proves that there are always 720 degrees, or two times unity of 360 degrees, less than the calculus’ assumption of 360 degrees times every point in every ‘spherical’ system. This 720 degrees equals the sum of the angles of a tetrahedron. We can state that the number of vertexes of any system (including a ‘sphere,’ which must, geodesically, in universal-energy conservation, by a polyhedron of n vertexes) minus two times 360 degrees equals the sum of the angles around all the vertexes of the system. Two times 360 degrees, which was the amount subtracted, equals 720 degrees, which is the angular description of the tetrahedron. We have to take angular ‘tucks’ in the nonconceptual finity (the calculus infinity). The ‘tucks’ add up to 720 degrees, i.e., one tetrahedron. The difference between conceptual de-finity and nonconceptual finity is one nonconceptual, finite tetrahedron.”
