¶ Design Revolution: Pulling the Bottom Up Sequence (2)
← Design Revolution: Pulling the Bottom Up Sequence (1) | Design Revolution: Pulling the Bottom Up Sequence (3) →
Index Entry
We have Karl Marx then running the same jargon, agreeing with the Darwinist argument-- survival of the fittest-- and saying that the fittest was the worker because the worker knew how to cope with nature. He knew how to cultivate, and handle the chisel, and so forth; and the other people were parasites. Marx had an absolutely firm conviction that this was logical; he was assuming that there was no where nearly enough to go around.
"I’m going to jump back now to the earliest days of humans on our planet and I’m going to note that amongst the mammals, or advanced mammals such as horses, we can see a stallion born amongst other stallions and he’s a little bigger and tougher and he is a challenge to the speediest and most powerful. There’s a fight between these two great stallions and the one who wins inseminates the others. And nature seems to have picked this way of having fights between the leading males to see which will inseminate the group. The other males can just go hump. And the big one doesn’t ask for it-- he just suddenly finds himself in that position. He fights and if he is the superior one, he carries on.
"Imagine this happening with men, men in very great ignorance,
